For practices managing chronic populations, the challenge is clear:
Cosán Group helps primary care organizations close that gap—stabilizing patients, reducing avoidable utilization, and building a scalable model for care between visits.
Chronic Care Management (CCM) and Principal Care Management (PCM) in primary care provide the structure to support patients continuously—improving outcomes, reducing avoidable utilization, and creating predictable reimbursement.
Without a model for care management between visits, patients deteriorate quietly, providers carry the burden, and practices miss both clinical and financial opportunities.
Care management is a CMS-supported model backed by years of real-world implementation.
Across Medicare and industry studies:
The takeaway:
When patients are consistently supported between visits, they are less likely to deteriorate.
Clinical Support Between Visits:
• Patient engagement
• Monitoring
• Coordination
Documentation & Risk Capture:
• RAF support
• Audit-ready workflows
Revenue Optimization:
• CCM/PCM activation
• Billing support
Operational Integration:
• Minimal provider lift
• Scalable model
A Medicare-supported program reimbursing non-face-to-face care coordination.
Studies show reductions of 5–30%, depending on implementation.
Staffing, workflow, and scalability challenges.
CCM supports patients with multiple chronic conditions, while PCM focuses on a single high-risk condition requiring intensive management.
They improve outcomes by enabling continuous monitoring and proactive intervention between visits, reducing hospitalizations and complications.
Yes. Many practices use both programs to support different patient populations and maximize both outcomes and reimbursement.
Because early warning signals—such as missed medications, labs, or follow-ups—are not monitored or addressed in real time.
When implemented correctly, they reduce provider burden by shifting coordination to structured care teams.
Many in-house CCM and PCM programs stall due to:
Care management requires infrastructure—not just effort
Most patient deterioration does not happen during office visits—it happens between visits.
Without structured CCM and PCM programs:
With a between-visit care model:
The difference is visibility between visits
Primary care organizations are increasingly responsible for patient outcomes—not just visits.
Care management extends care beyond the visit—without extending provider workload.
Chronic Care Management (CCM) and Principal Care Management (PCM) are Medicare-supported programs that reimburse providers for delivering non-face-to-face care coordination between visits.
Both programs enable continuous monitoring, proactive outreach, and coordinated care between visits.
👉 Together, CCM and PCM create a scalable between-visit care model
Primary care practices don’t need more work—they need better systems.
CCM and PCM programs create the structure to:

Uncover the hidden breakdowns in chronic care management that quietly drive patient deterioration and rising utilization. (LINK TO CLINICAL BLIND SPOTS BLOG)

Understand the key differences between CCM and PCM programs—and how each supports outcomes, risk management, and revenue. (LINK TO CCM PCM GUIDE)

Discover how to identify and proactively manage high-risk patients before they become high-cost escalators.(LINK TO HIGH RISK PATIENTS BLOG)

Avoid the most common operational and compliance mistakes that prevent CCM programs from improving outcomes and generating revenue. (LINK TO TOP 10 CCM MISTAKES BLGO)
|
See How We Can Help
|